SOLVED

Question
Answered step-by-step
Asked by DeanDiscovery8647
I believe Freud would explain the behavior of conscience in this scenario as “three parts: the id, the ego, and the super-ego.” (Dimmock & Fisher, 2017, p. 7). The id in this scenario would be the doctor protecting herself from malpractice lawsuits. She places her own desire of protecting herself over the moral consequence of her helping the person. Ego in this scenario is being shown by her gut reaction is to stop and assist the victim but her conscience tells her she is justified in driving on. “The conscience is the way the ego experiences the authority of the super-ego.” (Dimmock & Fisher, 2017, p. 8). Therefore, in super-ego the scenario address this because the doctor knows the moral thing to do is stop and assist the victims. Although her conscience is telling her she is justified to drive on super-ego would cause her to have guilt in her action. I believe her conscience was not correct. I understand the fear of there are no “Good Samaritan laws,” but these are victims who have crashed. This doctor can make a difference and save these victims lives. I don’t think it would be morally right to drive off. Respond to the post
SCIENCE
HEALTH SCIENCE
NURSING
PHL 2205

******CLICK ORDER NOW BELOW TO GET THE ANSWER TO THIS ASSIGNMENT OR ANY OTHER ASSIGNMENT, DISCUSSION, ESSAY, HOMEWORK OR QUESTION*******."