SOLVED696

what are the relevant facts of this case, “Before moving forward with the transplant, the hospital and the organ procurement center had a responsibility in this situation to notify the patient of the dangers associated with the donor and gain informed consent from the patient. According to the patient’s attorney, however, they did not warn the patient that the donor was high risk and that another patient had previously turned down the donor “because of his lifestyle.” Because of this, the doctor and the rest of the staff did not treat the patient in an appropriate manner and did not exercise reasonable care. DERELICT: Did the doctor or other members of the staff do something that they knew they shouldn’t have? or Did the doctor or the staff forget to do something that they were supposed to do? The patient was not informed by the doctor or other staff members of the hazards associated with the donor, which is a violation of the rules established by the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). They also did not screen the patient for HIV until just recently, after HIV and hepatitis were discovered during tests on another patient who
SCIENCE
HEALTH SCIENCE
NURSING

******CLICK ORDER NOW BELOW AND OUR WRITERS WILL WRITE AN ANSWER TO THIS ASSIGNMENT OR ANY OTHER ASSIGNMENT, DISCUSSION, ESSAY, HOMEWORK OR QUESTION YOU MAY HAVE. OUR PAPERS ARE PLAGIARISM FREE*******."