NEED A PERFECT PAPER? PLACE YOUR FIRST ORDER AND SAVE 15% USING COUPON:

Read the articles below and answer the questions on the critical appraisal table.   Chien, W. T., M

Read the articles below and answer the questions on the critical appraisal table.   Chien, W. T., M. Question
Answered step-by-step
Asked by elajene2

Read the articles below and answer the questions on the critical appraisal table.

 

Chien, W. T., Mui, J., Gray, R., & Cheung, E. (2016). Adherence therapy versus routine psychiatric care for people with schizophrenia spectrum disorders: a randomised controlled trial. BMC Psychiatry, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-016-0744-6

 

Dobber, J., Latour, C., de Haan, L., Scholte op Reimer, W., Peters, R., Barkhof, E., & van Meijel, B. (2018b). Medication adherence in patients with schizophrenia: a qualitative study of the patient process in motivational interviewing. BMC Psychiatry, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-018-1724-9

 

Hughes, F., Vess, J., & Johnson, E. (2018b). Increase Adherence to Psychotropic Medication Through Motivational Adherence Therapy: A Quality Improvement Project. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 39(8), 709-713. https://doi.org/10.1080/01612840.2018.1455118

 

Ertem, M. Y., & Duman, Z. Ç. (2019). The effect of motivational interviews on treatment adherence and insight levels of patients with schizophrenia: A randomized controlled study. Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppc.12301

 

McKenzie, K., & Chang, Y. (2015). The effect of nurse-led motivational interviewing on medication adherence in patients with bipolar disorder. Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppc.12060

 

 

 

Full Citation: Author, date of publication, title, journal

Aims or Purpose 

 

Design/
Method

Sample/ Setting

 

 

 

 

 

Major variables and how measured

Data
Analysis

 

 

Study Findings

 

 

 

Strength of the Evidence (i.e., level of evidence + quality [study strengths and weaknesses])

 

 

 

 

 

State the purpose, aims or research question

 

Design

Be more specific than quantitative vs. qualitative

Was this cross-sectional?  An RCT?   A meta-analysis, phenomenologic?

 

 

SAMPLE

Number, (N=?)

and Characteristics, 

 

SETTING

Description of setting

 

Dependent variables (e.g., DV = ). This will be your outcome variable, e.g., number of falls or ER visits, etc.

 

Independent variables

(e.g., IV1 = 

IV2 =).   These would be your process or balancing variables or measures.

 

If a qualitative study there will be no independent and dependent variables but there will be concepts of interest.

 

Describe methods of measurement.  This is how the variables were operationalized. 

 

What stats were used to answer the clinical question?

Please identify the test and what variable it measured. 

 

Examples:

 

Pearson’s Correlation Coefficient for association between EMS-SI and MBI

 

Regression Analysis – odds ratio/CI to evaluate the association between the dimension of burnout and the three safety outcomes 

 

Frequencies, percentages, means and their corresponding standard deviations and min/mas were examined for the participant characteristics

 

 

Statistical findings or qualitative findings (i.e., for every statistical test you have in the data analysis column, you should have a finding). 

 

 

Be sure to address how the results answer the research question or aims.

 

Examples:

 

-Higher reading comprehension scores correlated to 33% decreased risk of having a first relapse after initial treatment (tertile 3 vs 1 hazard ratio 0.67, 95% [CI]: 0.48-0.94, P trend = .02)

 

Self-efficacy significantly differed between the two groups during four centimetres cervical dilation (Z=−5.21, p<0.001) and eight centimetres cervical dilation (Z=−2.21, p=0.027).   Strengths and Limitations  of the study What is your assessment of the strengths and limitations; not only what the investigators identified as limitations. Risk or harm if study intervention or findings implemented Feasibility of use in your practice  Remember: level of evidence + quality of evidence = strength of evidence & confidence to act Use the evidence hierarchy for Level of Evidence use the scheme outlined in Appendix D inpart 3 of the lecture on quantitative analysis Quality of Evidence: If the study was of poor quality or had major limitations, make sure you note how the evidence may be changes by this.         SCIENCE HEALTH SCIENCE NURSING NURS 6102

Read the articles below and answer the questions on the critical appraisal table.   Chien, W. T., M

Solution:

15% off for this assignment.

Our Prices Start at $11.99. As Our First Client, Use Coupon Code GET15 to claim 15% Discount This Month!!

Why US?

100% Confidentiality

Information about customers is confidential and never disclosed to third parties.

Timely Delivery

No missed deadlines – 97% of assignments are completed in time.

Original Writing

We complete all papers from scratch. You can get a plagiarism report.

Money Back

If you are convinced that our writer has not followed your requirements, feel free to ask for a refund.

WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!