SOLVED314

is this shown Main ideas are clear, well-developed, and well-supported with engaging, persuasive examples and relevant textual evidence. The content is clearly linked and related to our learning resources. in this paper EVALUATE ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS The case study conflicts with several moral principles and theories, including autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, and paternalism. Autonomy is “a person’s rational capacity for self-governance or self-determination” (Vaughn, 2017, p.98). This principle respects the patient’s right to make decisions about their healthcare. R.L. has expressed a desire to discontinue life-sustaining treatment, which should be respected under this principle. However, his depression may be impairing his decision-making ability, which complicates the issue. Beneficence is a principle that requires healthcare providers to act in the best interest of the patient (Vaugh, 2017). In this case, the best interest of R.L. might be to continue the life-sustaining treatment to give him a chance to recover. Non-maleficence is a principle that requires healthcare providers to do harm. If continuing the treatment causes R.L. more suffering, it could be seen as causing harm. On the other hand, discontinuing treatment could lead to his death, which could also be seen as causing harm. Lastly, paternalism can be defined as “the overriding of
SCIENCE
HEALTH SCIENCE
NURSING

******CLICK ORDER NOW BELOW AND OUR WRITERS WILL WRITE AN ANSWER TO THIS ASSIGNMENT OR ANY OTHER ASSIGNMENT, DISCUSSION, ESSAY, HOMEWORK OR QUESTION YOU MAY HAVE. OUR PAPERS ARE PLAGIARISM FREE*******."