1. Based on the “Expenses” section below. I assessed the scope of costs associated with establishing. Question
Answered step-by-step
Asked by DeanOwl1792
1. Based on the “Expenses” section below. I assessed the scope of costs associated with establishing the WASH program but to be distinguished I need to identify each stage of implementation. How do I go about this?
2. Based on the “Funding” section below. I evaluated funding sources that could help fund this quality improvement project. To be distinguished, I need to make clear which are emergency funding sources and which are long term support. How do I go about this?
Expenses
Materials, labor, and maintenance, which can be seen in WASH activities in Ethiopia, will make up the costs of putting the action plan into place (International Rescue Committee, 2016). In the WASH activities, these accounted for almost 80% of the costs. A total of $203,000 was spent on the construction of 44 communal latrines as part of that undertaking. There were other costs associated with country administration (such as office upkeep and travel costs), capital expenditures (such as computer equipment and motorbikes), as well as initiatives to promote cleanliness and hygiene (chlorination tablets and educational signage). At most, these costs did not exceed $50,000 (International Rescue Committee, 2016).
Additionally, the cost of bringing water from a nearby ground source into the camp must be considered. According to Pezon (2014), multiple water stations are required to satisfy regulations due to the large number of migrants and estimates that a three-point water system serving 600 people costs $50,000. Additional maintenance expenditures of $3,000 per year (chlorination, testing, and pipe replacement) were also mentioned (Pezon, 2014). Total project expenses are projected to be $850,000, based on these figures.
Although the expenses may appear high at first glance, these projects have yielded a return on investment of 23 to 1 in the early 20th century alone (CDC, n.d.). According to Kindig (2015), the promotion of population health programs relies on this aspect in order to have the greatest health return on investment. It is possible to implement these cost-effective ideas in the refugee camp as they have been in other nations and achieve the same results. These expenses are far less costly than the human lives that would be lost as a result of inaction.
Funding
It’s feasible that this quality control project may benefit from business, non-governmental, or government funding. In the case of an emergency, international nations and the United Nations may be able to give funding. For the betterment of refugees’ health, the CDC collaborates with refugee organizations and partnerships, disseminating information on testing and treatment, illness monitoring, epidemic response, and education. Public/government financing, as well as private/non-profit philanthropy, have been active in the community in the past (McGinnis et al., 2015). Loans, budgets, taxes, tariffs, bonds, capital expenditure, and cost recovery mechanisms are all forms of government funding. Private contributors include investors, the private industry, non-profit organizations, small-scale finance, awards, and international loans. User fees, recipient fees, city sponsorship, credit, budget for education, electricity costs, and water fees are included in domestic expenses (McGinnis et al., 2015). As a group, the Global Disease Detection Program (GDD) pooled resources to urge a wide-ranging response to the threat of infectious diseases. Because of their strong ties, they’ve been able to identify significant facts and evidence-based approaches for detecting diseases and their underlying causes, such as water.
SCIENCE
HEALTH SCIENCE
NURSING
MHA 5028
1. Based on the “Expenses” section below. I assessed the scope of costs associated with establishing
